The Relationship Of The Blood Of Jesus And Baptism

All who claim to be Christians believe we are saved by the blood of Jesus. All believe that for the Bible clearly states it, “We have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins.” (Eph. 1:7 NKJV) There are very few, however, who realize where God has placed that blood, spiritually speaking.

Christianity is a religion of the spirit. No man is saved by coming into physical contact with the blood of Christ. This is simply a truism accepted by all. We do not each get a microscopic drop of literal blood placed on our souls. So the question then becomes where has God placed the blood in a spiritual sense? It does matter; it is a matter of salvation.

In the Bible, blood stands for life. God, speaking to Noah and his sons after the flood, said unto them, “You shall not eat flesh with its life, that is, its blood.” (Gen. 9:4 NKJV) Again, God, speaking to Moses in Lev. 17:11, says to Moses, “The life of the flesh is in the blood.” (NKJV) And then again, in Lev. 17:14, “The life of all flesh is its blood.” (NKJV)

In the New Testament, Judas, when he had betrayed the Lord, felt remorse and returned the 30 pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, saying to them, “I have sinned by betraying innocent blood.” (Matt. 27:4 NKJV) What did he mean by using the phrase “innocent blood”? He meant he had betrayed innocent life. Blood stood for life.

When Pilate washed his hands before the multitude who wanted Jesus put to death and made the statement, “I am innocent of the blood of this just person” (Matt. 27:24 NKJV), what did he mean? Was it not, “I am innocent of putting to death this innocent man”? Blood stood for life.

Jesus was God’s sacrificial lamb who, as John the Baptist said, takes away the sin of the world. (John 1:29) This required the shedding of his blood, the taking of his life. Jesus said, in instituting the Lord’s Supper, “For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.” (Matt. 26:28 NKJV) We are justified by his blood (Rom. 5:9) and “we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins.” (Eph. 1:7 NKJV)

When Jesus died on the cross his blood was shed in that his life was taken. Jesus had shed some blood prior to his death. There was the scourging he endured, the crown of thorns on his head, the nails driven through his hands; yet, all of that being true, he had not yet shed his blood in the Bible sense of the giving up of life itself. Surely no one believes we were saved by the literal blood of the scourging, thorns, or nails.

When Jesus uttered his last words on the cross and gave up the ghost, his blood was then shed in Bible parlance. John, in John 19:33-34, in speaking of what happened while Jesus was on the cross after his death, said, “But when they came to Jesus and saw that He was already dead, they did not break His legs. But one of the soldiers pierced His side with a spear, and immediately blood and water came out.” (John 19:33-34 NKJV)

This event, the piercing of his side, had symbolic importance, for the sacrifice of himself had already taken place, his life already given for ours. Remember Lev. 17:11? “The life of the flesh is in the blood.” With his side being pierced the life of Jesus was now gone for the whole world to see. His blood was shed in every sense of the word. Where was the soul-cleansing blood of Jesus shed? In his death, when he died on the cross, but now it was evident to all he was dead.

So, we know where Jesus shed his blood—in his death, at the moment he died. This then tells us all that if we are to come into contact with that blood we must enter into his death. For me to come into contact with that saving blood, spiritually speaking, I must get into Christ’s death. Paul was very clear on where and how you and I do this. He says in Rom. 6:3, “Do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death?” (NKJV)

He goes on, “Therefore we were buried with Him through baptism into death, that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.” (Rom. 6:4 NKJV) When is a person to walk in the newness of life? After baptism. Can one walk in newness of life unless the blood of Jesus has cleansed him? Newness of life comes to a man upon being raised from the waters of baptism. God placed the cleansing blood in the waters of baptism. In that act, when done from a heart of faith and having repented of one’s sins, the blood of Jesus cleanses a man or woman from all sin.

But objection is made by man, and it is said baptism is a little thing. Is the blood of Jesus a little thing? If one can be saved without baptism into the death of Christ then one can be saved without the blood of Jesus.

Paul, in 2 Cor. 5:17, makes this statement, “Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new.” (2 Cor. 5:17 NKJV) Bearing that in mind, what did Paul say to us in the passages just under consideration? Did he not say, “Do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus … ?” (Rom. 6:3 NKJV) Yes, he said we were baptized into Christ.

In Christ how? By being baptized into him. Where is one a “new creation”? In Christ. How can a man be a new creation (2 Cor. 5:17) unless the blood of Christ has cleansed him? In Christ, I am cleansed, a new creation, but I am baptized into Christ. I get into Christ by baptism. The blood of cleansing then, spiritually speaking, is found in baptism.

In talking to Timothy, Paul says this is a faithful saying, “For if we died with Him, We shall also live with Him.” (2 Tim. 2:11 NKJV) We died with him by being baptized into his death. (Rom. 6:3) Paul says if we did that we shall live with him; thus the blood of Jesus must be contacted in the waters of baptism. It is only through his blood that we have life. But what if we did not die with Him in baptism? I will let the reader answer.

Then Paul says in Eph. 5:25-26, “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her, that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word.” (Eph. 5:25-26 NKJV) Does anyone believe the church Jesus loved and gave himself for has not been cleansed by his blood? But the text says he cleansed the church with the “washing of water by the word.” Thus the blood was in the waters of baptism.

There is an interesting passage in Heb. 10:22 where the writer is admonishing those to whom he wrote. He says, “Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water.” (NKJV) Let us couple that with what Peter spoke of concerning baptism in 1 Peter 3:21, “There is also an antitype which now saves us—baptism (not the removal of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God), through the resurrection of Jesus Christ.” (NKJV)

To have one’s heart sprinkled from an evil conscience (Heb. 10:22) is the same as to have a good conscience toward God (1 Peter 3:21). Peter says this is accomplished in baptism while the Hebrew writer speaks of our bodies being washed with pure water. They are one and the same. The clean conscience is acquired through being baptized. Peter goes so far as to say baptism saves us. The blood of Christ must then be found in the waters of baptism. That is where the conscience is cleansed. The conscience cannot be cleansed from God’s standpoint without the blood of Jesus. It is cleansed in baptism. This is the only logical deduction one can make.

I realize an article like this is going to be very, very unpopular. People want no part of baptism being a salvation issue. Passage after passage teaches that it is (Acts 2:38, Acts 22:16, 1 Peter 3:21) plainly and clearly. In fact, when God’s word says “repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins” (Acts 2:38 NKJV) one wonders how such a passage can be misunderstood by rational men.

A question that arises in my mind is this. Let us suppose for the sake of argument that God wanted to tell men that they must be baptized to have their sins forgiven and to be saved. Since the language he used is not adequate to satisfy the mass of mankind how would you, if you were him, phrase it to make it clear to all readers? What words would you use to convey the idea? Remember what he said as stated was not adequate to convince men. You would have to use other words. What words would you use?

People are not rational when it comes to religion. In religion, emotions generally rule. Men and women often cannot see the truth because as plain as it might be they are not willing to accept it because they do not want to see and know the truth. Perhaps truth condemns them or their family and maybe some of the family has already passed on while living in error. In other cases, truth may prohibit them from living the kind of life they would prefer to live. Add to those things, change can be very uncomfortable. It may be much easier to continue as you are versus changing with the unpleasantness that can bring in relationships. Whatever the cause, a refusal to accept truth gives them a comfort, temporary though it may be, that they cannot find in the truth itself.

I want to close with this. You and I might wish it was some other way. Some cannot bear the thought that they have family now gone who, if what I have written today is the truth, never accepted the truth and died in error. We worry about them and we are not willing to accept the truth because of where we think that would place them. My advice is to leave those matters with God, for he will do what is right. If they end up in the wrong place in the life to come, do you think you will bring them joy by meeting with them there? You would only add sorrow to sorrow, guilt to guilt.

But I have to ask you one other question, a momentous question. Are you going to pass error on to your children and grandchildren after you? If Mom and Dad died in error, they are now in God’s hands. Let him deal with the matter. As for you, you likely have children, grandchildren, a spouse to be concerned about, some or all of these. Will you lead them down the road of error because of the past? If so, you will likely get what you deserve. How could it be otherwise?

Did Jesus command baptism? If he did (you know he did), you know your duty.

[To download this article or print it out click here.] 

The Cleansing Of The Church At Ephesus

How was the church at Ephesus cleansed from sin? To be cleansed from sin is to be saved. Likely the most well-known Ephesian passage is found in chapter two, verses eight and nine, “For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works, that no one should boast.” (NAS) Many, many passages of the New Testament teach that salvation is a matter of God’s grace (Acts 15:11, Rom. 3:24, Gal. 2:21, 5:4, Eph. 1:7, 2:5, 2 Thess. 2:16, 2 Tim. 1:9, Titus 2:11, Titus 3:7, 1 Peter 1:10, 1 Peter 1:13). I have listed most of them here so the reader will know I am well aware of them.

I am thankful it is that way. If salvation were by works we would all come up short “for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” (Rom. 3:23 NKJV) That is what happened to the Jewish people under the Law of Moses. None were able to keep it. “Cursed is everyone who does not continue in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.” (Gal. 3:10 NKJV) I think we are all glad salvation is a matter of God’s grace, versus works, for works demanded perfection.

God’s grace, which gives us salvation, is granted to us as a result of faith we possess. “Therefore having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom also we have obtained our introduction by faith into this grace in which we stand.” (Rom. 5:1-2 NAS) “For by grace you have been saved through faith.” (Eph. 2:8 NAS) There are many other passages teaching that we are saved by faith. Here are quite a number of them: John 3:14-16, John 8:24, John 11:25-26, John 20:31, Acts 16:31, Rom. 10:9, 1 Cor. 1:21, Gal. 3:22, 1 Tim. 1:16, Heb. 11:6, 1 John 5:13, Rom. 3:26, 28, 30, 5:1, 11:20, Gal. 2:16, 3:24, 26, Eph. 2:8, Phil. 3:9, 1 Peter 1:9. These were again listed that the reader might know I am fully aware of them.

The question that arises, however, is what is this faith that justifies, that gives us God’s grace? I am not asking what the object of the faith is, for we know that. I am asking what the nature of this faith is. Many, perhaps most, are persuaded today (and have been since the Reformation) that it is merely a state of the mind regarding a belief one has in Jesus, who he is, and what he has accomplished for us. It is mental assent to the teachings of the scriptures about him. This is the faith that it is said saves. I certainly agree with that as far as it goes, but it stops short, too short.

One must not only believe what the scriptures teach about Jesus—who he is, what he accomplished—but faith also commits us to believe the man himself, believe what he said, and act on it. If faith does not lead to action, it is dead faith (James 2:17). James says it is “useless.” (James 2:20 NAS) Even in this world, as regards worldly matters, how can we say we have faith in a man when we will not take the man at his word?

The faith the Ephesians had that resulted in their cleansing from sin was the faith they had in what Jesus taught them through his inspired representatives. Paul was an inspired man, but the Holy Spirit, whether speaking through Paul or through any other apostle or first-century prophet, did not speak on his own initiative. “He will not speak on his own initiative, but whatever he hears, he will speak…he shall take of mine, and shall disclose it to you.” (John 16:13-14 NAS—the words of Jesus referring to the Holy Spirit) Thus, the Holy Spirit spoke the words of Jesus, and Jesus was thus their teacher.

Paul said later in the book of Ephesians that Jesus cleansed the church, “by the washing of water with the word.” (Eph. 5:26 NAS) “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave Himself up for her; that He might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word.” (Eph. 5:25-26 NAS)

Who was cleansed that way? Those who Paul said earlier in the book had been saved by grace through faith (Eph. 2:8). The washing of water with the word is clearly a reference to baptism. What did Jesus teach about baptism? “He who has believed and has been baptized shall be saved.” (Mark 16:16 NAS) “Unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.” (John 3:5 NAS)

John 3:5 and Eph. 5:26 teach the same thing. The Spirit gave the word. The Spirit working through the word works on our spirit, if we will allow it to do so, changing our thinking, our attitudes, our desires, and our will, bringing us to the point where we are ready to put the old man to death and be baptized to arise in “newness of life.” (Rom. 6:4 NAS) To be cleansed by the washing of water by the word (Eph. 5:26) is the same as to be born of water and the Spirit (John 3:5).

Furthermore, in scripture, the church (Eph. 5:25-26) and the kingdom (John 3:5), generally, not always but generally, are interchangeable terms. Peter was given the keys of the kingdom. When he used those keys, by preaching the gospel on the Day of Pentecost in Acts 2, and people believed and obeyed, they were added to the church, one and the same as the kingdom. They were saved.

Were the Ephesians saved by grace through faith “before” they were cleansed? What was the church, the church being the members, cleansed of, if not sin? Can you be saved without first being cleansed of sin? They were saved by grace through faith when cleansed of sin by the washing of water with the word. That washing was done by “the obedience of faith.” (Rom. 1:5 NAS) Paul said he had received grace and apostleship, “to bring about the obedience of faith among all the Gentiles.” (Rom. 1:5 NAS)

Paul himself, obviously a church member, was told at his own conversion, “Why do you delay? Arise, and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on his name.” (Acts 22:16 NAS) Paul had experienced the same washing and for the same reason the church had at Ephesus. No, water itself cannot wash away sins, but it can if God has made the decision that that is the time and place where he will act in response to a person’s faith. Some have said baptism is a test of faith. I do not argue with them.

Naaman, in the Old Testament, “became furious” (2 Kings 5:11 NKJV) when told he needed to go wash in the Jordan seven times to be healed of his leprosy. He did not want to do it that way. His faith had brought him thus far to Elisha, and he felt that should be good enough. Elisha should just come out and “stand and call on the name of the Lord his God, and wave his hand over the place, and heal the leprosy.” (2 Kings 5:11 NKJV) Obedience of faith had no place in his thinking. One is reminded of today.

No, the water of the Jordan had no magical power to heal Naaman, but faith in what God told Naaman to do, a faith strong enough to get him to act simply because God said to do it, was the faith that made the difference. Naaman is an excellent example of a man who experienced two types of faith. The first failed him in obtaining his objective. Why? Because it was based on his preconceived ideas of how God should do things.

When told to go wash in the Jordan seven times, “Naaman became furious, and went away and said, ‘Indeed, I said to myself, “He (reference to Elisha, God’s prophet—DS) will surely come out to me, and stand and call on the name of the Lord his God, and wave his hand over the place, and heal the leprosy.”’” (2 Kings 5:11 NKJV) Naaman’s faith that failed was faith in his own idea of how God should act. Naaman admits as much when he says, “I said to myself.”

His later faith that brought Naaman healing was based not on Naaman’s personal thinking but on what God said—“Go and wash in the Jordan seven times.” (2 Kings 5:10 NKJV) This was the faith that brought healing when his faith became strong enough to become obedient to God’s word.

This illustrates man’s faith today in the spiritual realm with regard to baptism. There are two types of faith in what is commonly referred to as Christendom, as it relates to our salvation. The one says we will stop here at the point of faith (mental assent). We have gone far enough; God will do the rest. The other faith says God said to do it (be baptized) for this reason (the remission of sins—Acts 2:38); I believe him, and I will do what he says because I do believe. Both have what men generally call faith, but clearly, the faith is not the same.

There is also a question that needs to be asked. If Paul did not consider baptism to be salvation by works, why should we consider it to be so in our day? I have never heard a direct answer to that question. Paul tells the Ephesians they have been saved by grace through faith (Eph. 2:8) and then tells them at the same time they have been cleansed by the washing of water through the word (Eph. 5:26). He doesn’t miss a beat, doesn’t seem in the least to feel he has contradicted himself, so why should we feel that the two passages are contradictory? Why do we feel we have to try to devise a way to explain away the obvious meaning of the phrase “the washing of water”?

But there is much more in proof of the point I am making. In Eph. 1:7, Paul says, “In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of his grace.” (NAS) In him is a reference, obviously, to Jesus who shed his blood for us. How does one get into him, into Jesus Christ? Gal. 3:27 says we were “baptized into Christ” (NAS) and so does Rom. 6:3, “do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus.” (NAS) I know of no passage in the New Testament anywhere that tells one how to get into Christ other than through baptism.

If you were to start through the book of Ephesians and start marking every passage you come to that talks about different things that are found “in him,” “in Christ,” “in the Beloved,” here is some of what you would come up with: (1) every spiritual blessing—Eph. 1:3, (2) grace—Eph. 1:6, (3) redemption—Eph. 1:7, (4) an inheritance—Eph. 1:10-11, (5) sealed with the Holy Spirit—Eph. 1:13, (6) seated us in heavenly places—Eph. 2:6, (7) kindness toward us—Eph. 2:7, (8) his workmanship—Eph. 2:10, (9) brought near by the blood of Christ—Eph. 2:13, (10) partakers of the promise—Eph. 3:6. But one must note that all of these blessings are in, not outside of, but in Christ. “For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ.” (Gal. 3:27 NAS) How does one enter Christ? By baptism. If one is clothed with Christ, he is in Christ.

Paul says elsewhere in the book of Ephesians, “we are members of his body.” (Eph. 5:30 NAS) But then Paul tells us in 1 Cor. 12:13 how we get into that body, “For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body.” (NAS) What is Christ the Savior of according to Paul in Ephesians? “For the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ also is the head of the church, he himself being the Savior of the body.” (Eph. 5:23 NAS) This is the same body we are baptized into, that is, if we are in it, for that is the only way the scriptures give of entering into it. The body of Christ, being the church (Eph. 1:22-23), is that which was cleansed “with the washing of water by the word.” (Eph. 5:26 NKJV)

Where is grace found? The Bible tells us, “Be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus.” (2 Tim. 2:1 NAS) Paul tells the Ephesians that this grace is “bestowed on us in the Beloved.” (Eph. 1:6 NAS) Again, how does one get into Christ, the Beloved, according to the scriptures? We have already answered that. When one is led by faith to believe Jesus and obey him in baptism for the remission of sins, he enters into Christ, into the realm of grace by which he is saved.

In the book of Acts, chapter 19, Paul comes to Ephesus and finds 12 men there who are disciples. He asks them this question: “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” (Acts 19:2 NAS) They respond no, they had not even heard of the Holy Spirit. Paul then says, “Into what then were you baptized?” (Acts 19:3 NAS) Please note this one thing—Paul takes it for granted that if they were Christians, they had been baptized. He doesn’t ask them if they had been baptized. Why not? Paul doesn’t ask them because he knows what it takes to become a Christian and be saved. “Why tarriest thou? Arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins.” (Acts 22:16 KJV, Ananias speaking to Saul, a believer, before Saul’s baptism)

One also ought to note the first thing Paul did with these 12 men, after learning their situation, was to have them “baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.” (Acts 19:5 NAS) Yes, Paul taught baptism at Ephesus. Paul stayed in Ephesus at least two years (see Acts 19:10) after this event, so when Paul said later in Ephesians that the church was cleansed by the washing of water with the word, there is no doubt he knew from personal experience all about baptism at Ephesus. There is no such thing as an unbaptized Christian, for Jesus commanded in the Great Commission (Matt. 28:19) that all disciples be baptized. Paul either baptized them personally or saw to it that they were baptized by one or more of those who helped with the work. Either that or he disobeyed Christ, for which disciple was it that Christ said need not be baptized?

Faith is not just something to be believed but also obeyed. One must obey the gospel to be saved (2 Thess. 1:7-8). In a sense, the gospel is the faith (Jude 3); it is that body of doctrine that is to be believed, but within that body of doctrine that constitutes the faith, there are things that must be obeyed as well as believed. In addition to mental assent to the truth about Jesus as revealed in the scripture, one must repent of sins (Acts 17:30), one must confess with the mouth the Lord Jesus (Rom. 10:9-10), and one must be baptized into Christ, baptized for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38, Gal. 3:27). Faith, the faith that saves, is not a dead faith but an active one. It is by faith that a man does these things, by faith because he heard the words of God and believed them enough to take them to heart and obey them.

Do not allow yourself to be misled. A person does not believe Jesus who believes the doctrine that says, “he who has believed and has not been baptized shall be saved,” for that is not what Jesus said. Jesus said just the opposite.

I have asked this question before, but have never gotten an answer. If Jesus wanted man to know that baptism was essential to the remission of sins, the cleansing from sin, how would he say it in a way to get man to understand it? He could not say “repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins” (Acts 2:38 KJV) for he already said that via the Holy Spirit speaking through Peter, and men will not accept it.

How would he say it to make it plain and simple enough so all could understand it? No one has yet answered that question. The truth is, Jesus has stated it as clearly as it can be stated by mere words alone. Men will either accept it or reject it and thereby be judged.

Have you been cleansed with the washing of water by the word? Will you be one with those saints in Ephesus Paul wrote to, or are you going to be another kind of Christian unknown to the church at Ephesus?

[To download this article or print it out click here.]

The Real Motive

The state of Indiana has been in the national news spotlight in recent days over the protests of Indiana’s new Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The protest began in earnest this past Saturday, March 28, 2015, with a march in Indianapolis and has since spread nationwide with businesses threatening to pull out of Indiana and/or boycott the state.

The law attempts to provide some degree of protection to Christians, in particular Christians who run businesses, who, due to religious beliefs, do not want to be forced by law into taking part in things that would violate their conscience, things like gay marriage. The protesters claim the law gives a license to discriminate against gays by refusing them services that a business would provide to others.

The truth is, no Christian who reads the New Testament and actually believes what it says (there are some who no longer believe) is going to be willing to aid and assist anyone determined to commit sin when he realizes that is what is happening. The sin does not matter. It could be homosexuality, adultery, theft, deception, whatever the sin might be. No Christian becomes a party to sin. No Christian helps another commit sin.

If the homosexual is discriminated against because the Christian will not help him sin, if that is your definition of discrimination, then by the same standard of reasoning the adulterer, the thief, the deceiver, and all others are likewise discriminated against by the Christian who lives his faith. The Christian faith does not allow one to facilitate sin. Yes, the Christian does business with sinners every day. However, he does not do it in a way to help in the commission of a sin.

A Christian who aids and abets one determined to sin is little better than Balaam, who Jesus said, “taught Balak to put a stumbling block before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed to idols, and to commit sexual immorality.” (Rev. 2:14 NKJV) Balaam was going to help Israel commit sin via Balak.

The agenda, the real motive behind the protests, is to drive Christian faith into silence and out of the public sphere, to marginalize it and make it as insignificant a part of American life as possible. There have already been a few instances nationwide where small Christian businesses have been sued successfully for their failure to provide services for those gay couples planning weddings. When court costs, fines, etc., are figured into the equation, such suits essentially destroy the tiny family-owned business and threaten even the financial survival of the family that owns it.

This is really a matter of vengeance against those of faith. How hard would it be to get a wedding cake made or a photographer in to have pictures taken? How hard would it be to get one in willing to do that? Would not the loving thing be to just take the wrong and go on? It would if they were Christians, which they are obviously not. “Now therefore, it is already an utter failure for you that you go to law against one another. Why do you not rather accept wrong?” (1 Cor. 6:7 NKJV) Of course, this is not to say the one who refuses to bake the cake for a gay wedding ceremony is in the wrong, but only that the Christian thing to do is to refrain from suing. But there is no Christianity in gay marriage.

Those who oppose this Indiana law on the basis that they think it discriminates against gays feel that such discrimination would be wrong—in their eyes sinful, evil. That is strange, almost inexplicable, coming as it does from those who have rejected God’s word on the subject of sin. How do they define sin if they are not going to use the Bible to do it? How do I know what is sinful and what is not apart from God’s word? Well, let me guess; man makes himself into God and decides what is sinful and what is not.

If it had not been for the Bible, the word sin would never have been in man’s vocabulary. The word “sin” is first used in Gen. 4:7, where God is speaking to Cain, although sin itself was first committed by Adam and Eve. John the apostle defined sin as “the transgression of the law” (1 John 3:4 KJV), the law being the law of God.

The gay lobbyists have rejected Rom. 1:24-27, 1 Cor. 6:9-10, 1 Tim. 1:9-10, and Jude 6-7, so I am sure they are not willing to take the Bible’s word for what constitutes sin nor are they willing to let God define love. “For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments.” (1 John 5:3 NKJV) If they do not like what a passage teaches, they just put it into a category like foot washing, confine it to the first century, or make it figurative. They cannot endure a literal interpretation of the word.

It is not that hard to reject God’s word, if you are so inclined, and still claim Christianity, which is the very thing many of the non-atheists among them do. Of course, many among them are outright atheists, and none will accept the word of God as is. You will hear much about love from them, but be aware and be certain they will get to define it, not God. Their definition is toleration, toleration, toleration.

It is a smorgasbord man-made religion that supports these protests. It is the kind of religion a secular world desires if it must endure religion at all. If this group believed God meant what he said, and believed it was applicable today, they would have no part of Christianity, declare God the sinner, and become God-haters. Their Bible has been made flexible, so its meaning changes with the changing cultural seasons of society. They alone will decide what is sin.

So what is the standard that man uses to determine right from wrong, righteousness from unrighteousness, when one has rejected literal New Testament texts on sin? If the word of Christ is not reliable, where is the text that is reliable, that provides a standard for judging right from wrong? Without a standard, who dares make himself God and declare for all men what is righteous? The answer is the gay lobbyists, at least on this and related subjects.

[To download this article or print it out click here.]

The Army of The Lord

“The army of the Lord” is a phrase found only once in the NKJV of the Bible, and that in the Old Testament in Joshua 5:14, where Joshua, in the vicinity of Jericho, meets up with one who says of himself that he is the “Commander of the army of the Lord.” (NKJV) However, having said that, it is clear from many different New Testament passages that while the church is never called an army, it is clearly described as an army in that each Christian is considered a soldier, outfitted with battle gear, a weapon, and is to be engaged in spiritual warfare. Since the church is composed of its individual members, each member a soldier, it follows that the church is the army of the Lord here on earth.

In the book of Philippians, Paul refers to Epaphroditus as his “fellow soldier.” (Phil. 2:25 NKJV) He does the same with Archippus in Philemon verse 2, and almost every Bible student is familiar with Paul’s admonition to Timothy where he tells him, “You therefore must endure hardship as a good soldier of Jesus Christ.” (2 Tim. 2:3 NKJV) If we are honest, we realize that is an admonition to us as well if we desire to be a faithful Christian.

We ought to put emphasis on the phrase “must endure hardship,” for it is easy to think that, in our day and age and in our country, there is no hardship to be endured as a Christian. Wrong! Paul made it clear it is not a matter of whether or not we will be persecuted, but more a matter of when or where or to what degree, for he says, “Yes, and all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution.” (2 Tim. 3:12 NKJV)

There is, I think, a greater implication in Paul’s statement than we generally are willing to accept. We think if someone on the national scene has spoken against Christianity, and we hear about it, that we have been personally persecuted because we are a Christian. Yet, in the first century, when Paul was writing, there was no national news that you were going to get instantly, unlike today. The persecution Paul spoke about was far more direct and personal.

Paul was speaking to a single individual in his letter to Timothy and saying to him, paraphrasing, if you are a Christian and are living like it and talking about it—the command is to “go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature” (Mark 16:15 NKJV)—then you are going to suffer for it. If we do not suffer for it (sooner or later), then maybe that says a lot about our failure to live the life as God intended it to be lived. That is the implied teaching of the passage; if there is no suffering personally, then there is likely no actual living of the life as Christ intended one to live it.

The Christian life is referred to as warfare. Paul says, “The weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God … .” (2 Cor. 10:4-5 NKJV) Timothy was encouraged to “wage the good warfare.” (1 Tim. 1:18 NKJV) To Timothy, Paul says in the second letter to him, “No one engaged in warfare entangles himself with the affairs of this life, that he may please him who enlisted him as a soldier.” (2 Tim. 2:4 NKJV) This was in the very next verse after Paul told him he must endure hardship as a good soldier of Jesus Christ (2 Tim. 2:3).

A lot of people enter into the Christian life sort of unaware. They are thinking love, peace, mercy, grace, and hope. They are not expecting combat and are ill-prepared and often unready and unwilling to engage in it. Yes, there is love, peace, mercy, grace, and hope in Christ, but one has to remember these are mostly things that are found within one’s inner being because of what he has become in Christ and what Christ has done for him. As far as the outside world goes, it is an entirely different matter.

You have, to a large degree, become the enemy to the world unless you are going to try and be a secret disciple and never speak of Jesus or just go on living like the world. If you decide on that course, you will get along fine in this world, but there is always the Day of Judgment to look ahead to. That will be a looking forward to “a certain fearful expectation of judgment, and fiery indignation which will devour the adversaries.” (Heb. 10:27 NKJV)

But, as I said, many are not ready for the combat. In the parable of the soils, the one unprepared for combat is the one represented by the stony soil (describing the heart of man) where when the seed was sown (the word of God) it was received and sprouted and came up, but “when tribulation or persecution arises because of the word, immediately he (the person with this kind of heart—DS) stumbles.” (Matt. 13:21 NKJV) He is neither prepared for nor willing to engage in the fight. The heart’s desire is only for the smooth things of Christianity, the blessings.

At the end of his life, Paul said he had “fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith.” (2 Tim. 4:7 NKJV) It had been a fight indeed. Remember when Paul was being converted? Do you remember the words of Jesus when speaking with Ananias about Paul? He said, “I will show him how many things he must suffer for My name’s sake.” (Acts 9:16 NKJV)

One can read about the life of Paul and his sufferings in summary in 2 Cor. 11:23-33. He talks about his beatings, imprisonments, being stoned, and many other things that came his way in his life as a Christian. It had been a fight, a lifelong fight after his conversion. And here is the lesson we need to learn from this, those of us who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus: the battle Paul fought was a religious fight, the very kind many feel is too unchristian, or un-Christ-like, to fight.

It was a fight over doctrine, over who was right and who was wrong, over who would be saved and who would not, over the way to heaven. Too many people today see this as an exceedingly nasty type of fighting that drives people away from Christ, they say. Don’t talk to me about that. Your fight would be with Jesus, Paul, Peter, and others. Jesus and Paul were in religious debates nearly all of the time.

Jesus said, “Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. For I have come to ‘set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.’ And ‘a man’s foes will be those of his own household.’” (Matt. 10:34-36 NKJV) Paul got in trouble because he was unwilling to remain quiet about his religion and insisted on evangelizing and debating. Come to think about it, that was pretty much the same reason Jesus was crucified, was it not?

But most of the talk today by the Christian community, as the world would define it, seems to be about getting along, how we are all going to the same place no matter what we believe or practice, and how it is so unchristian to fight with one another. Some are willing to go so far with this approach as to say one does not even have to be a Christian to go to heaven.

Jude says he wrote “exhorting you to contend earnestly for the faith.” (Jude 3 NKJV) One cannot do that and not debate religion. “We do not war according to the flesh. For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ.” (2 Cor. 10:3-5 NKJV) Christian debating (casting down arguments) is a part of the Christian warfare.

Debating is as far as it goes. No Christian, living as a Christian, would ever do harm to another. “Love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you.” (Matt. 5:44 NKJV) Christian wars are a misnomer. The Crusades and other European religious wars were not Christian. Jesus’ kingdom is not of this world.

When one looks at the armor a Christian is to put on to fight the Christian warfare, “put on the whole armor of God” (Eph. 6:11 NKJV), that he might stand and not fall, one finds that he is given “the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.” (Eph. 6:17 NKJV) This is the word which is described in the Hebrew letter as being, “living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.” (Heb. 4:12 NKJV)

There are those today who would remake the sword of the Spirit into a butter knife. Just sharp enough to cut soft butter, and that’s it. They do not want a sharp two-edged sword, one that pierces in the way described in Hebrews 4:12. The fear is that someone might get hurt, that is, get their feelings hurt. They are not going to wield any such sword, and so you can forget them as an active soldier in the Lord’s army. They will not debate the truth; they will not contend earnestly for the faith; they will not wield a two-edged sword.

One of the great failings of Christian understanding is to understand that until the heart is pricked with the sword of the Spirit (and someone has to wield it), there can be no repentance, no seeking of salvation, and no turning from error or sin to the truth. You may hurt a man’s feelings for a day, yet save his soul for eternity. Until a man is convicted of the truth in his heart, the truth of his own sin, of his own error, the truth of what God requires of him, there will be no movement on that man’s part and thus no salvation.

I will never forget the wisdom of an old, long-gone preacher of my youth, one I never met but knew of, who has now been gone for a few decades. He was talking to a man who had been convicted of the truth but who was nevertheless unhappy with the preaching; the man felt the preacher had not spoken as softly and kindly as perhaps he could have, and this offended the man. The old wise preacher made a comment along these lines concerning the preacher the man was critical of—“That preacher is the best friend you will ever have. He taught you the truth and convicted you of it.” Obviously, this is a paraphrase, but that is pretty much the exact thought expressed and how true it was and is yet to this day. Many is the man who will speak softly to us and who will allow us to go to hell before they will offend us, but how many men are there who will tell us the truth? Which of the two is really our friend?

I told my children when they were growing up that one of the worst things that happens with adulthood is that when you reach that point, there are few who are willing to tell you the truth, even when you are dead wrong. When we are growing up, we have parents, teachers, and other adults who do not hesitate to jump in and let us know we are in the wrong, but once a man or woman reaches adulthood, suddenly no one is friend enough to any longer tell us the truth about ourselves. They nod and say yes to whatever we say. The days of being rebuked for a bad attitude and wrongdoing, whether toward God or man, have come to an end. We are thus always right and never wrong, so we are led to believe, and how dangerous that is.

I close with this. God has an army. A man is either going to be in it and be a faithful soldier and take the sword of the Spirit and use it properly, which means for something other than buttering sinners up, or else he is not. Either way, there are consequences that follow. For the one who picks up the sword of the Spirit and then drops it and turns tail and runs, the Bible says, “The cowardly … shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.” (Rev. 21:8 NKJV) Since that is the case, the only real choice a man or woman has, accept it or not, is to use the sword or not, fight or die.

[To download this article or print it out click here.]